[Tig] eyesight- lenses

pmendelson pmendelson at ascentmedia.com
Thu Oct 5 10:33:38 PDT 2006


Rob,

In the second iteration I guided the technician in where the center point
should be.  Normally, they will have you put on the frames with dummy glass
and look straight ahead.  They will put a little dot at a point that
intersects.  This will be where (and I don't know the math here) some
predefined point on the gradient will fall.  I had been craning slightly
upwards in front of the computer.  By telling them to adjust that point
slightly upwards, I got a better compromise between far and mid vision.
In your case, you may have the additional problem of striking a compromise
that still yields a natural stance in front of a Telecine monitor.
Your mileage may vary.


Phil


On 10/5/06 10:23 AM, "Rob Lingelbach" <rob at colorist.org> wrote:

> 
> On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:32 , pmendelson wrote:
> 
>> Rob,
>> 
>> 
>> I've been wearing them for over 10 years now.  Any good lens
>> professional or
>> ophthalmologist will tell you that they are not for everyone.  They
>> can take
>> quite a while to get used to, and some people never do.
>> In my case, it took about a week, but the results have been great.
>> Computer viewing distance, however, can fall into a nether region
>> that you
>> can't seem to optimize without craning your neck. But, since there
>> is no
>> hard boundary, there will be a sweet spot.  The question is where
>> that sweet
>> spot will fall relative to the position of your neck. Luckily, the
>> gradient
>> can be adjusted up or down at the time the lenses are ground.  In
>> my case,
>> the second iteration was the charm.
> 
> thank you, what was the difference between the first and second
> iteration?
> If I still have to crane my neck  (Bob Crane was unfortunately
> murdered) then
> why should I change-- I mean this:  for closuep reading I have no
> problem if
> i just move my lenses out of the way.   But for medium distance small
> font reading,
> man, it's like misery, I have to lean in or back way off and then the
> font's too small
> anyway.   For ordinary viewing, at optimum monitor distance for a
> colorist, all is
> perfect.   For a distance roughly halfway to my eyes, like an Apple
> Cinema Display
> at about 35-40" with small fonts, it's a real problem.  will there be
> a sweet spot in this
> case, or should I just crane and realize it's a symptom of eye muscle
> ineptitude?
> 
> thanks
> Rob
> 





More information about the Tig mailing list